Historic Underfunding, Redressment and a Sense of Ourselves
By Mike McIntyre, Psychology
The University has struggled, since shortly after its transformation from United College, with a funding base more suited to a college within a university than to an independent university. This under-funding has restricted the budgetary freedom of the University to bring our salaries in line with similarly sized and mandated universities. It is very much in the interest of the administration to have salaries for faculty and staff that are distributively just. Just salaries enhance recruitment and retention and foster morale. The monies available to redress injustice, however, are limited. Grant and tuition increases typically allow us barely to keep pace with inflationary pressures and provide very little room for discretionary improvements. The main source of funds beyond the percentage growth provided by changes to the grant and tuition monies is provided by fall-in from the existing budget. For example, the retirement or resignation of a senior professor who is replaced by a junior professor may save as much as $75K in salary and benefits. This type of fall-in constitutes the major source of funds for the University to make progress—perhaps, tediously slow progress— toward institutional goals. What is required is a commitment by the University to establish a distributively just salary structure and to make reaching this goal an institutional priority. The more senior amongst us may remember that Dr. Duckworth made such a commitment and that it motivated the 12% increase in the first Collective Agreement. Every nook and cranny in the University’s budget was searched to secure adequate resources. Essentially, all the fall-in for a period of years was devoted to making the salary structure of the first Collective Agreement possible.
Thursday, April 14, 2011 at 1:11PM by
UWFA
30th Anniversary,
April 2011,
UWinnipeg,
funding,
students in
Features 